Monthly Archives: February 2016

So I Use Instagram…

So I use instagram. I am new to the service and finally joined after consistent pestering from friends and family. Not having much of a penchant for photography made my aversion stronger, but I relented when I finally realized what I was missing:

  • Instagram allows me to show photos (obviously) in a method with seemingly less stigma attached to it. I can photograph my breakfast without much disdain from others (jokingly, more often than not).
  • It allows me to follow people’s media exclusively rather than filtering posts on Facebook (a tiresome process).
  • It serves as an online repository of my work that I can choose to share or not share.

Overall, it’s proven to be a worthwhile signup. I’m more of a photographer than I thought.

Discovering Quora

I have tasked with investigating a new social networking site as part of my coursework and have decided to focus on Quora. Prior to this, I had heard of Quora but never felt compelled to check it out. My (brief) introduction to it happened when I was searching Google for help with a very specific situation. I don’t remember the topic of my search but I know I typed in a complete sentence as opposed to just using keywords. For this week’s discussion, I decided to try it out and see if I want to become a regular user of Quora.

Background Info: Basically, Quora is a website for questions and answers. Users ask and answer questions on a variety of professional and personal subjects. Upon signing up, users choose from a variety of feeds they want to follow and subjects about which they are knowledgeable. The characteristic that sets Quora apart from other services with “Q&A” features like “Yahoo! Answers” is that users can collaborate, suggest revisions to answers, “vote” or “downvote” both questions and answers, and comment. While other sites like Reddit have very similar uses, Quora seems to encourage collaboration to a higher degree. Simply put, it aims to be a community of experts sharing their expertise.

Creating an account was easy. After clicking the Quora link, I signed in via Facebook and was given suggestions for feeds and topics based on the interests I had on my Facebook profile. Using a search feature, I selected feeds that matched my work and academic interests (Instructional Design, Libraries). I could’ve selected personal interests too, but I want Quora to be designated for professional activities. Overall, signing up was quick and painless.

Immediately after creating an account, I started exploring. Questions categorized in the feeds you selected appear on your homepage with a side menu that allows the user to narrow it down to specific topics. To ask a question, users type their queries into a search box at the top of the page and tag it with subjects. I decided to test this out for myself and asked, “How do you deal with a difficult patron?”. Once I entered my question, I removed the suggested tags (tequila?), added “Libraries and Librarianship”, and posted the question. Once posted, I noticed that I could “ask to answer” or “answer the question” (even though it was my own). Within a few hours, i got a very detailed answer with lots of links to helpful materials. I could also see that others had voted on the response in agreement. All in all, very helpful and efficient.

My next step was to answer a question. I found one on qualifications for a library job and decided it was a good place to start. In doing so, I noticed that many people had already answered the question and a particularly high quality answer received a lot of votes. I personally felt it was a great answer and gave it my vote.

I am very intrigued by Quora. Using it reminded me of the book Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. I read this book when I was getting my first Masters Degree and remembered it vividly. In this book, Cass Sunstein discusses the advantages and disadvantages of an “information society” and the impact on sharing and obtaining information. In short, there is a lot of good and bad information out there. This directly relates to Quora because it seems as though the purpose of the site is to promote good and weed out bad information. Overall, I think I will contribute to Quora and think it has a lot of advantages over similar sites. I strongly feel that I can answer questions effectively and vote for answers that I think are helpful.

Connecting with Connectivism

Technology is altering (rewiring) our brains. The tools we use define and shape our thinking. -George Siemens

Technology has been continuously transforming our brains since Web 1.0 at an exponentially increasing rate. The most obvious of these changes are apparent in our methods for accessing and sharing information via social media. Using popular apps and online tools for collaboration, acquiring information in prodigious quantities has never been easier. In using these tools, we are actively improving our ability to research, collaborate, and “learn to be” (Brown & Adler, 2008).

These changes, however, have also adversely impacted our cognitive processes. Some examples of this include our diminished capacity for remembering phone numbers and birthdays, the potential for depression in a culture of “sharing” on Facebook (jealousy, comparing oneself to the “happy posts” of others, etc.), and the ubiquitous availability of bad information. Despite these lamented aspects, it seems clear that we are being “rewired” for the better.

The only way in which my thinking departs from this quote stems from my professional experience as a librarian. On a weekly basis, I find myself assisting a student impacted by “digital divide”. Despite the potential for technology to accommodate a wide range of learning styles and abilities, the impact of technology on learning has left many people in the dust. In other words, I feel that the statement from Siemens is correct, but does not include a central component of his thesis.

Although technology is transforming our brains, it is important to stress the role of the learner in the process ( and Siemens would agree with me). Based on the concepts addressed by Siemens in “Learning and Knowing in Networks”, it is clear that the role of the educator has changed and will continue to do so in network-based learning. However, the impact of technology on our cognitive process requires active participation from the student/participant. We are changing, but active participation is required.